No Matter Who vs. No Matter Whom – Which is Correct?
No matter who and no matter whom are both possible, but no matter who is the standard choice in everyday sentences. Use whom when it clearly functions as an object in formal writing, as in “no matter whom you choose.” In practice, “no matter who you choose” is accepted and natural.
Table of Contents
No Matter Whom or No Matter Who: Which Is Correct?
No matter who and no matter whom are both grammatically possible. The difference depends on the pronoun’s grammatical role and the level of formality.
Use who when the pronoun acts as the subject of the following verb: “No matter who arrives first, we will begin.” Use whom when the pronoun acts as the object of a verb or preposition: “No matter whom you invite, provide enough seating.”
For a broader review of these case distinctions, compare “Who” vs. “Whom” in formal usage.
However, in contemporary American English, no matter who is widely used even when traditional grammar would recommend whom. For most everyday and professional writing, “no matter who you choose” sounds more natural than “no matter whom you choose.”
The Best Trick to Remember the Difference
Use the he/him swap test. If you can replace the pronoun with he or she, choose who. If you would use him or her, choose whom.
- No matter who calls: “He calls,” so who is traditionally correct.
- No matter whom you call: “You call him,” so whom is traditionally correct.
A useful shortcut is to remember that whom is the more formal, object-case form. When in doubt in ordinary conversation, “no matter who” is usually the most natural choice.
| Word | Part of Speech | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| No matter who | Concessive fixed phrase | Regardless of which person | No matter who asks, give the same answer. |
| No matter whom | Concessive fixed phrase | Regardless of which person, in an object position | No matter whom you select, notify the team. |
How to Use No Matter Who
No matter who introduces a condition that applies regardless of the person involved. It is common in conversation, general writing, journalism, advertising, and professional communication.
Use it when who is the subject of the verb that follows it. It also appears very frequently before clauses such as “you ask,” “you choose,” and “you invite,” where many speakers naturally prefer who even though traditional grammar may call for whom.
Example 1: No matter who arrives first, please let the manager know.
Example 2: No matter who you ask, the procedure remains the same.
Example 3: No matter who wins the election, the new administration will face difficult decisions.
Etymology of the Phrase No Matter Who
No matter developed from the noun matter, meaning a concern, subject, or importance. The phrase came to mean “regardless of” or “irrespective of.” Who comes from Old English hwā, the subject form of the personal interrogative pronoun. Together, the phrase means “regardless of which person.”
How to Use No Matter Whom
No matter whom is the traditionally formal form used when the pronoun functions as the object of a verb or preposition. It is especially suitable in highly edited prose, legal writing, academic writing, and contexts where maintaining traditional case distinctions matters.
In modern English, many speakers use no matter who in the same positions. Therefore, “no matter whom you choose” is formally careful, while “no matter who you choose” is ordinary, widely accepted usage.
Example 1: No matter whom you appoint, the committee must approve the decision.
Example 2: No matter whom she consults, she receives the same recommendation.
Example 3: No matter to whom you address the letter, use the department’s official title.
Etymology of the Phrase No Matter Whom
Whom comes from Old English hwām, the dative form of the interrogative pronoun. Over time, it became the object form corresponding to who. The phrase no matter whom combines the concessive expression no matter with this formal object form.
Related Concepts
Understanding pronoun case and subordinate clauses makes the difference between no matter who and no matter whom easier to recognize.
- Subject pronouns: Subject pronouns perform the action of a verb. Who is traditionally the subject form, as in “Who called?”
- Object pronouns: Object pronouns receive the action of a verb or follow a preposition. Whom is traditionally the object form, as in “Whom did you call?”
- Concessive clauses: A concessive clause expresses an “it does not matter” condition. In “No matter who applies, everyone will be considered,” the outcome remains unchanged regardless of the person.
- Fused relative clauses: Expressions such as “whoever you choose” contain a pronoun that combines the functions of a relative pronoun and an implied noun phrase. This helps explain why modern usage often favors who in familiar constructions.
Examples from Media and Literature
The expression is common in dialogue, news writing, speeches, and literary narration because it emphasizes that a result applies to every person or any person.
- News style: “No matter who forms the next government, economic reform will remain a central issue.” This construction is natural in political reporting.
- Film and television dialogue: “No matter who you are, you can ask for help.” The informal who suits conversational speech.
- Business writing: “No matter who handles the account, the client should receive a prompt response.” This is clear and professional.
- Formal literary narration: “No matter whom the traveler encountered, he offered the same warning.” The use of whom creates a more formal, traditional tone.
- Public speeches: “No matter who joins us, every voice deserves respect.” The phrase gives the statement an inclusive, universal quality.
No Matter Who or Whom in Common Expressions
Several related expressions follow the same general pattern. The choice between who and whom depends on whether the pronoun is traditionally a subject or an object.
| Expression | Traditional Use |
|---|---|
| No matter who comes | Use who because the person comes. |
| No matter whom you invite | Use whom because you invite that person. |
| No matter who wins | Use who because the person wins. |
| No matter to whom you speak | Use whom after the preposition to in formal writing. |
No Matter Who Synonyms
| Synonym | Definition |
|---|---|
| Whoever | Any person who; the particular person does not matter. |
| Regardless of who | Without considering which person is involved. |
| Irrespective of who | Regardless of the person involved; somewhat formal. |
| Any person who | A clear, explicit alternative to “whoever.” |
No Matter Whom Synonyms
| Synonym | Definition |
|---|---|
| Regardless of whom | Without considering which person is the object of the action. |
| Irrespective of whom | Regardless of the person involved; formal in tone. |
| Whomever | Any person who functions as an object in a formal construction. |
| Regardless of the person | A plain-language alternative that avoids pronoun-case questions. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Question 1: Is “no matter whom” grammatically correct?
Yes. “No matter whom” is grammatically correct when whom functions as the object of a verb or preposition, especially in formal writing.
Question 2: Is “no matter who you choose” correct?
Yes. Although traditional grammar may prefer “no matter whom you choose,” the version with who is extremely common and accepted in modern American English.
Question 3: Should I use “no matter who” or “no matter whom” professionally?
Use no matter who for most professional communication because it is natural and broadly accepted. Choose no matter whom when writing in a highly formal style or when strict traditional pronoun case is important.
Conclusion
No matter who is the best general-purpose choice, while no matter whom remains correct when the pronoun is an object in formal usage. Use the he/him swap test to identify the traditional distinction, but remember that modern English commonly favors who. Pro Tip: In professional writing, prioritize clarity and natural phrasing; reserve whom for contexts where its formal precision adds value.
